Home News Don Lemon Sees ‘Racism’ in Evaluating BLM to Jan 6 Capitol Rioters

Don Lemon Sees ‘Racism’ in Evaluating BLM to Jan 6 Capitol Rioters

159
0

Showing on Tuesday’s New Day on CNN, Don Lemon defended the liberal double normal of obsessing over the January 6 Capitol Hill riot whereas defending the usually violent left-wing protesters who rioted after the loss of life of George Floyd.

The CNN host insisted that it was verifiable indisputable fact that “systemic racism” was guilty for such police violence, and declared that those that in contrast the 2 are motivated out of “racism.”

After insisting that his debatable opinion was truth, he referred to as social media to punish customers who disseminate false info.

Host John Berman arrange the section by studying quotes from two judges concerned in a number of the Capitol riot instances who had conflicting views of whether or not the Jan 6 riot and the anti-police riots had been comparable acts of political violence.

Lemon handled final 12 months’s riots over policing as extra worthwhile as he claimed that protesters had a authentic motive:

(Capitol Rioters) had been primarily doing what? Attempting to undermine democracy, and that’s fairly completely different than protesting since you are upset about one thing. One is breaking the regulation from a lie — constructed on a lie. There was nothing in regards to the election that was stolen or something that was untoward. It was one of the vital safe — probably the most safe election in our nation’s historical past.

The opposite one was constructed on frustration and anger over what? A justice system that principally — that’s systemically racist in the direction of folks of colour. That’s the reality. The regulation exhibits that. The details present that. So one is a lie — constructed on a lie. The opposite is constructed on — out of frustration over a system that must be corrected.

 

 

Co-host Brianna Keilar introduced up the difficulty of left-wing rioters looting shops:

There are lots of individuals who agree with the decide who conflates the 2, proper? They do not see the distinction between riots, the place somebody is breaking right into a shoe retailer and looting, and a riot the place you have folks coming into the Capitol whereas Congress is in session certifying an election.

Though many extra died and way more harm was performed because of the anti-police riots that went on for months, in distinction with these from Jan 6, Lemon downplayed looting as nobody talked about the arsons and different violence.

It was additionally not talked about that, simply as homicides elevated between 2014 and 2016 after the anti-policing activism promoted by the media created the Ferguson effect, there was a a lot bigger improve in homicides in 2020, with many of the improve coming at the expense of African Americans.

Lemon declared that such conservative-minded critics had been “not residing in actuality,” and blamed “racism” for evaluating the 2 occasions:

…folks see what they wish to see, and so they enable their very own racism to come back to mild. We see it — we get it. However you do not wish to see it, and you do not wish to get it. So those that are saying, “There isn’t a systemic racism — there may be not distinction between these issues,” come on. You are not value it.

The CNN host then moved to the difficulty of censorship of social media customers, claimed that information media like CNN are extra reliable, and demanded  “penalties” for individuals who unfold misinformation.

For instance of how misleading information shops like CNN will be, final April on the exact same New Day, present common John Avlon gave a “Actuality Verify” during which he misleadingly gave viewers the impression that many of the 1,000 police taking pictures victims every year had been in all probability African American, though the share was closer to 25 percent, which was in proportion with the FBI’s reporting of crime patterns from the Obama administration.

 

 

CNN has thus far not confronted any “penalties” for grossly misinforming the general public on the racial breakdown of police-involved violence, and creating a false rationale that was repeatedly utilized by rioters.

This episode of CNN’s New Day which provides cowl to criminals answerable for 1000’s of violent crimes was sponsored partly by vmware. Their contact info is linked.

Transcripts observe:

CNN’s New Day
October 5, 2021
8:50 a.m. Japanese

JOHN BERMAN: So a Federal decide sentencing a Capitol rioter rejected comparisons between the revolt and a number of the civil unrest that arose from final 12 months’s protest towards racial inequality. 

The decide stated, “To check the actions of individuals across the nation protesting principally peacefully for civil rights to a violent mob in search of to overthrow the lawfully elected authorities is a false equivalency and downplays the very actual hazard that the gang on January sixth posed to our democracy.”

Simply final week, a special decide on the identical courtroom urged Capitol rioters had been handled extra harshly, saying, quote, “The U.S. Lawyer’s workplace would have extra credibility if it was even-handed in its concern about riots and mobs within the metropolis.”

(…)

DON LEMON: They had been primarily doing what? Attempting to undermine democracy, and that’s fairly completely different than protesting since you are upset about one thing. One is breaking the regulation from a lie — constructed on a lie. There was nothing in regards to the election that was stolen or something that was untoward. It was one of the vital safe — probably the most safe election in our nation’s historical past. The opposite one was constructed on frustration and anger over what? A justice system that principally — that’s systemically racist in the direction of folks of colour. That’s the reality. The regulation exhibits that. The details present that. So one is a lie — constructed on a lie. The opposite is constructed on — out of frustration over a system that must be corrected.

(…)

BRIANNA KEILAR: There are lots of individuals who agree with the decide who conflates the 2, proper? They do not see the distinction between riots, the place somebody is breaking right into a shoe retailer and looting, and a riot the place you have folks coming into the Capitol whereas Congress is in session certifying an election.

LEMON: One, a shoe will be changed. And the vote is the worth of a shoe. Once more, no one must be doing that — no one must be stealing something from anybody. The opposite one, are you able to exchange a democracy?

(…)

So there’s fairly a distinction. I believe the individuals who see the identical, wish to see the identical — once more, not working in actuality. And when you take a look at the truth examine of what John stated — when you take a look at the truth examine of getting George Floyd’s brother on and also you see what’s occurring within the New York Metropolis Police Division, and also you see what’s occurring all around the nation, once more, folks see what they wish to see, and so they enable their very own racism to come back to mild. We see it — we get it. However you do not wish to see it, and you do not wish to get it. So those that are saying, “There isn’t a systemic racism — there may be not distinction between these issues,” come on. You are not value it.

(…)

So we are saying one thing on this community that’s not true, there are repercussions and ramifications, proper? We face the implications. In the event you do this on social media, there are not any penalties. It is the Wild, Wild West. I can go on and say that you just, you recognize, “When was — John, when was the final time you beat your spouse?” or any of these issues on social media. And there are not any penalties for it though it isn’t true.

(…)

What’s posted on social media must be true. If it isn’t true, it must be taken —

BERMAN: So what does Fb do?

LEMON: Take it down. If it isn’t true, take it down. If it isn’t true, do not enable folks to place it up there. Have them face penalties.

(…)

CNN’s New Day

April 15, 2021

7:56 a.m. Japanese

JOHN BERMAN: So the killing of Daunte Wright has reignited calls from some progressive members of Congress to defund or outright dismantle policing in America. Is that the proper pathway to reform? John Avlon right here with a “Actuality Verify.”

JOHN AVLON: There’s an overdue reckoning over the killings of younger black males by police, and there is majority assist for important police reform. However there are additionally strident slogans from politicians that do not assist in any respect — like Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib’s tweet earlier this week calling for no extra policing. Let’s be clear. This can be a horrible thought as a matter of politics and practicality. It is an extension of the decision to defund the police, which Donald Trump used as a cudgel to hit Democrats within the final election regardless of Joe Biden’s disavowal. 

Many defenders primarily say that “defund the police” must be taken severely however not actually. After the Trump presidency, I assumed that we agreed that phrases matter. It does not even signify the neighborhood it seeks to serve. A Gallup ballot from August of 2020 discovered that 80 p.c of black Individuals wish to maintain and even improve the quantity of police of their neighborhoods. 

The true concern is what sort of policing they’re receiving. Contemplating the alleged minor offenses that led to high-profile killings by police lately — Daunte Wright pulled over for expired plates; George Floyd for a counterfeit $20 invoice; Walter Scott pulled over for a damaged taillight; Eric Garner for promoting unfastened cigarettes; Alton Sterling for promoting CDs. And these are just some examples. In keeping with FBI statistics, black Individuals made up 30 p.c of arrests for curfew violations or loitering — 29 p.c of playing arrests in 2019 — whereas native research present they’re far extra prone to be arrested for jaywalking. A lot for former AG Invoice Barr’s insistence that there is not systemic racism in police departments.

This wants to alter, however gutting or chopping police departments is not going to realize some utopia. It would do the alternative. As a substitute, there must be important retraining and reform. Cops have to concentrate on de-escalating conditions and decriminalizing some victimless misdemeanors to scale back causes of battle. It helps that some 27 states have decriminalized and even legalized leisure marijuana, contemplating that black Individuals are arrested greater than thrice as a lot as whites for possession regardless of equal utilization charges.

In 2020, Republican Senator Tim Scott proposed a invoice to require reporting requirements to be used of power and no-knock warrants. Democrats stated it did not go far sufficient and proposed a ban on choke holds and racial profiling, a restrict on army transfers of kit to police, and eliminating certified immunity, which protects officers from lawsuits once they violate a citizen’s constitutional rights.

Good folks can disagree on the particulars, however we have to agree on the details — like the truth that 991 folks have been shot and killed by the police over the previous 12 months, in line with the Washington Publish. We additionally want to acknowledge that regardless of some fear-fueled appeals, violent crime and property crime have plummeted because the Nineteen Nineties.

Lastly, we should always not fall into the lure of demonizing all law enforcement officials who do a vital, tough, harmful, and usually thankless job. We will assist the overwhelming majority of excellent cops whereas insisting on holding unhealthy cops extra accountable and make investments in altering the tradition that has led us to this disaster of confidence and the fundamental promise of equal justice beneath the regulation. And that is your “Actuality Verify.”